Skip to content
Pico y Pala – Bitcoins, Ethereum, Ripple,…

Is Bitcoin a Ponzi scheme? Choose your facet within the newest Cointelegraph Crypto Duel!


Kraken Bitcoin strategist Pierre Rochard debates professor of laptop science Jorge Stolfi on whether or not Bitcoin meets the definition of a Ponzi scheme.

Does Bitcoin meet the definition of a Ponzi scheme? That is the topic of the newest Cointelegraph Crypto Duel, the place Bitcoin strategist at Kraken meets professor of laptop science on the College of Campinas, Jorge Stolfi.

Much like different Bitcoin skeptics, Stolfi repeatedly outlined Bitcoin as a Ponzi scheme. The core of his argument is that Bitcoin doesn’t produce any money flows and the cash with which Bitcoin traders are paid comes solely from new traders shopping for Bitcoin.

“Each time you spend money on Bitcoin, the cash that you simply make investments goes to the earlier traders or to the miners and disappears”, Stolfi stated.

Responding to Stolfi’s argument, Rochard identified that Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer money system and, like different types of cash, it isn’t supposed to provide a money circulation.

“It is only a basic property of cash as a result of it’s money. So it would not have money flows and that does not make it a Ponzi scheme.”, Rochard stated.

Rochard additionally identified that Bitcoin is completely different from Ponzi schemes in that it doesn’t assure mounted returns, and is well-known to be a extremely dangerous asset.

“Bitcoin’s promoters repeatedly emphasize that there’s a danger of loss and that if we have a look at the empirical information, this danger has repeatedly been realized”, stated Rochard. “That is not how Ponzi schemes work”, he added.

Stolfi, nonetheless, is satisfied that efficient Ponzi schemes don’t promise return since that will be “a useless giveaway.” “The S.E.C. would come knocking at your door the subsequent day”, he argued.

For example, the pc scientist talked about the infamous Madoff’s Ponzi scheme, which defrauded hundreds of traders for $65 billion. “He did not promise something. […] The rationale why folks invested in it’s that he was paying all people who wished to money out”.

Choose your facet and watch the complete debate on Cointelegraph’s Youtube channel!